David Fincher’s
The Social Network is a masterpiece. Too often we are blessed with a director who manages only one great film. Once in a very great while, however, there comes a director with a style all his own who creates art… repeatedly. David Fincher is one such director. He has given us legendary and dark films such as
Fight Club and
Se7en. I’m hoping his next film is just as good as his last.
The Social Network is a film that seems long overdue to me. Facebook is perhaps the largest phenomenon on Earth right now, with 750 million active users. For reference, that is 50% larger than the entire European Union’s population. Nearly one half of United States citizens have a registered Facebook account, which means there are twice as many users of the site in the US alone than there are people in the United Kingdom. There have been approximately 10,590,687 movies about the U.K. and just one about Facebook. But that one movie makes up for all those years without one. Jesse Eisenberg takes his place as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, playing him with a wonderful cynicism. Justin Timberlake plays Napster creator Sean Parker, an arrogant dirtbag that runs Facebook’s co-founder and CFO Eduardo Saverin out of the company. The aforementioned CFO Eduardo is played by actor Andrew Garfield. Disney Channel star Brenda Song makes a surprising appearance as Eduardo’s unbelievably sexy (and batshit crazy) girlfriend Christy. With the exception of Sean Parker (Timberlake), all of the above attend Harvard in the fall of 2003. The movie begins with a visually relaxing shot of Zuckerberg and his then-girlfriend Erica drinking casually in a bar. Mark is spewing facts and thoughts relentlessly, rarely pausing, even to answer a question. He changes subjects randomly and confuses Erica constantly. This is my first impression of Zuckerberg, and immediately we can see that he is brutally intelligent and has a pretty restless mind. He strikes me as a character greatly influenced by James Joyce and his stream of consciousness. After a few ill-placed comments, his girlfriend dumps him and he jogs home through Harvard.
 |
| Mark gets dumped because he's "an asshole." |
This was my favorite part. Barely five minutes into the movie, Mark is being a total jerk and you can see his cold disregard for other people. On his run home, an eerily dark piano song plays and we see most of Harvard. Upon arriving at his dorm, Zuckerberg starts blogging rudely about Erica to make him feel better. Eventually he stumbles upon the idea to compare female undergrads at Harvard to one another online by hacking their photos from the university’s dorm “facebooks.” Mark’s site eventually reaches most of the student body and the intense traffic (at 4 AM, mind you) crashes Harvard’s network. When called in front of the administrative board, Zuckerberg is apologetic in a calculated way, but obviously not sincere. He is also clearly proud of himself. The poor kid is placed under academic probation for six months. The middle of the movie is filled with Zuckerberg inventing theFacebook, dropping out of Harvard, meeting new partners for the site, and finally being sued twice. The plaintiffs are three Harvard students, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, who claim that Mark stole their idea for theFacebook, and is former best friend and business partner Mr. Eduardo Saverin.
 |
| One of the Winklevoss twins in court against Mark. |
Essentially this is one big case of intellectual property theft. Together, Mark and Sean Parker write Eduardo out of the company (by diluting his shares within the company to practically nothing). Eduardo obviously doesn’t take this news well. Instead he charges Mark’s workspace and tears him a new one. His display of raw emotion is the best in the film. He is hurt, distraught, angry beyond words, and vengeful. Mark, in response, is calm, collected, and seemingly apathetic. Throughout the entire movie, Mark’s responses to emotion from others are identical. Despite facing serious anger, aggression, and hatred, Mark just sits there, even commenting on the weather in response.
 |
| Eisenberg and Garfield as former best friends Mark and Eduardo. |
The emotional diversity of the characters is outstanding. I’m pretty sure Mark is the most introverted person I’ve ever seen. Every little detail is internalized. Nothing upsets him, and he rarely shows his own true emotion (except from perhaps glimpses of excitement over moments of power over others). He comes across as highly apathetic, but in reality he is emotionally naïve and hides behind a false ego. Most of us can relate to this in some way, because his attitude is essentially human nature in society, only exaggerated greatly. It is his relevance to the audience that makes us like him at all. Despite being intelligent and inventing this website, he really only does one thing well: provoke and instigate others. Ordinarily this would make such a person the film’s natural antagonist (being as he antagonizes others). Here, however, he is the obvious protagonist, because we journey with him through intense emotional turmoil and loss.
 |
| Mark (Eisenberg) observes and calculates. |
Mark’s utter complexity is the movie’s triumph. His character ranks among my favorites in all of filmdom. He is charismatic, brutal, intelligent, witty, arrogant, quirky, devilish, relevant, inventive, confused, omniscient, mysterious, wonderful, innocent, informal, honest, deceitful, perfect, imperfect, apathetic, emotional, frustrated, calculating, cold, excitable, merciless, introverted, independent, dependent, welcoming, forgetful, awkward, comfortable, careful, careless, rational, and condescending. He is everything a college student and entrepreneur should be, and everything I want to be.
Official Redrew: five out of five stars. A wonderfully refreshing movie about the most relevant topic on earth that deserves the recognition it has garnered. Jesse Eisenberg is flawless. Direction and Writing are equally impressive. My Favorite movie.